1. Haberler
  2. News
  3. Swiatek, Sinner, Halep & Moore – what are the differences and similarities in their doping cases?

Swiatek, Sinner, Halep & Moore – what are the differences and similarities in their doping cases?

yayınlandı
0
featured


Bu içerik, tenis oyuncusu Tara Moore’un doping testi sonucunda yaşadığı süreci ve yaşadığı zorlukları anlatmaktadır. Moore’un dünya sıralamasında 600 basamak gerilemesi ve resmi tenis tesislerine giriş yapamaması nedeniyle ABD’deki halka açık kortlarda başlangıç seviyesindeki oyunculara antrenörlük yaparak para kazanmaya başladığı belirtilmektedir. Moore, yaşadığı bu sürecin toplam maliyetinin 200.000 sterlin olacağını ve bu masrafları karşılamak için çevrimiçi bağış topladığını ifade etmiştir. Ayrıca, Moore’un doping testi sonucunda aldığı cezanın detayları ve yaşadığı hukuki süreç anlatılmaktadır. Moore’un test sonucunun kontamine et yemekten kaynaklandığına karar verilen durum, olayın karmaşıklığını ortaya koymaktadır. İçerik, Moore’un savunmasını ve yaşadığı hukuksal süreci detaylarıyla anlatmaktadır.
[ad 1]

#Swiatek #Sinner #Halep #Moore #differences #similarities #doping #cases

Kaynak: www.bbc.com

Moore slipped 600 places in the world rankings during her case and, as players serving a doping suspension cannot enter official tennis facilities, ultimately earned money by coaching beginners on public courts in the US.

Moore told The Times in July she believes the total cost of the case will be £200,000, and she has crowdfunded to cover her training and ongoing fees.

Her case, too, was complex.

Twenty-one players were tested in Bogota, and Moore was one of three to return an adverse analytical finding for boldenone – something the independent experts described as “striking” because of how unusual it was.

The panel ruled contaminated meat was the source of Moore’s failed test. The written reasons show how difficult it was for Moore to prove when and where she had ingested the contaminated meat. She had eaten meat in different restaurants in Bogota seven days before the positive test, so it was hard to pin down the source.

Moore did provide evidence showing cattle are administered with nandrolone metabolites and boldenone in Colombia, which the tribunal described as “interesting and powerful”.

The ITIA, however, argued that even if Moore had eaten contaminated meat, she should have been aware of the risk.

The tribunal “firmly rejected” that, by eating meat, Moore had acted with fault or negligence. It added players had received no warnings about the risks, and none were given until “well after” this event.

Swiatek, Sinner, Halep & Moore – what are the differences and similarities in their doping cases?
Yorum Yap

Yorumlar kapalı.