New ethics inquiry details more trips by Clarence Thomas paid for by wealthy benefactors | Clarence Thomas
New ethics inquiry details more trips by Clarence Thomas paid for by wealthy benefactors | Clarence Thomas
yayınlandı
0
Bu içerik, Demokrat senatörlerin Yüksek Mahkeme etik kurallarıyla ilgili yaklaşık iki yıllık bir soruşturmasını detaylandırıyor. Soruşturma, Adalet Clarence Thomas tarafından yapılan daha fazla lüks seyahati ve Kongre’nin yeni bir davranış kurallarını uygulamak için bir yol oluşturmasını öneriyor. Ancak, konuyla ilgili herhangi bir ilerleme, halkın mahkeme üzerindeki güveninin rekor düşük seviyelere ulaştığı bir dönemde, Cumhuriyetçilerin Ocak ayında Senato’yu kontrol altına alması nedeniyle pek olası görünmüyor. Soruşturmanın sonucunda, Thomas’ın 2021’de raporlanmayan ek seyahatler yaptığı ve servet sahibi destekçilerden aldığı hediyeler ve seyahatlerin ayrıntılarını içeren 93 sayfalık bir rapor yayınlandı. Yüksek Mahkeme 2023’te ilk etik kurallarını kabul etti ancak uygulama her bir yargıç tarafından bırakıldı. Senatör Dick Durbin, “Ülkenin en yüksek mahkemesinin en düşük etik standartlara sahip olamayacağını” belirtti. Rapor ayrıca diğer yargı organlarındaki değişiklikleri ve Kongre tarafından daha fazla soruşturma yapılmasını da talep ediyor.
[ad 1]
A nearly two-year investigation by Democratic senators of supreme court ethics details more luxury travel by Justice Clarence Thomas and urges Congress to establish a way to enforce a new code of conduct.
Any movement on the issue appears unlikely as Republicans prepare to take control of the Senate in January, underscoring the hurdles in imposing restrictions on a separate branch of government even as public confidence in the court has fallen to record lows.
The 93-page report released on Saturday by the Democratic majority of the Senate judiciary committee found additional travel taken in 2021 by Thomas but not reported on his annual financial disclosure form: a private jet flight to New York’s Adirondacks in July and a jet and yacht trip to New York City sponsored by billionaire Harlan Crow in October, one of more than two dozen times detailed in the report that Thomas took luxury travel and gifts from wealthy benefactors.
The court adopted its first code of ethics in 2023, but it leaves compliance to each of the nine justices.
“The highest court in the land can’t have the lowest ethical standards,” the committee’s chair, Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, said in a statement. He has long called for an enforceable code of ethics.
Republicans have said the investigation is a way to undermine the conservative majority court, and all the Republicans on the committee protested against the subpoenas authorized for Crow and others as part of the investigation. No Republicans signed on to the final report, and no formal report from them was expected.
Thomas has said that he was not required to disclose the trips that he and his wife, Ginni, took with Crow because the big donor is a close friend of the family and disclosure of that type of travel was not previously required. The new ethics code does explicitly require it, and Thomas has since gone back and reported some travel. Crow has maintained that he has never spoken with his friend about pending matters before the court.
The report traces back to the late justice Antonin Scalia, saying he “established the practice” of accepting undisclosed gifts and hundreds of trips over his decades on the bench. The late justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and retired justice Stephen Breyer also took subsided trips when they were on the bench but disclosed them on their annual forms, it said.
The investigation found that Thomas has accepted gifts and travel from wealthy benefactors worth more than $4.75m by some estimates since his 1991 confirmation and failed to disclose much of it. “The number, value and extravagance of the gifts accepted by Justice Thomas have no comparison in modern American history,” according to the report.
It also detailed a 2008 luxury trip to Alaska taken by Justice Samuel Alito. He has said he was exempted from disclosing the trip under previous ethical rules.
Alito also declined calls to withdraw from cases involving Donald Trump or the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol after flags associated with the riot were seen flying at two of Alito’s homes. Alito has said the flags were raised by this wife.
Thomas has ignored calls to step aside from cases involving Trump, too. Ginni Thomas supported Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election that the Republican lost to Democrat Joe Biden.
The report also pointed to scrutiny of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who, aided by her staff, has advanced sales of her books through college visits over the past decade. Justices have also heard cases involving their book publishers, or involving companies in which justices owned stock.
Biden has been the most prominent Democrat calling for a binding code of conduct. Justice Elena Kagan has publicly backed adopting an enforcement mechanism, though some ethics experts have said it could be legally tricky.
Justice Neil Gorsuch recently cited the code when he recused himself from an environmental case. He had been facing calls to step aside because the outcome could stand to benefit a Colorado billionaire whom Gorsuch represented before becoming a judge.
The report also calls for changes in the Judicial Conference, the federal courts’ oversight body led by Chief Justice John Roberts, and further investigation by Congress.
New ethics inquiry details more trips by Clarence Thomas paid for by wealthy benefactors | Clarence Thomas
Yorumlar kapalı.